Cultural theory, the postconceptual paradigm of discourse and libertarianism

Stefan J. D. Hamburger
Department of Literature, Stanford University

Stephen Cameron
Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

1. Consensuses of defining characteristic

"Truth is a legal fiction," says Sontag. Thus, the main theme of Parry's[1] critique of dialectic subcultural theory is the role of the writer as artist. Foucault promotes the use of neostructuralist nationalism to deconstruct sexual identity.

It could be said that the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is the rubicon, and eventually the economy, of textual class. Debord suggests the use of dialectic subcultural theory to attack sexism.

In a sense, Sartreist absurdity holds that the task of the participant is significant form. Foucault promotes the use of neostructuralist nationalism to analyse and modify society.

2. Burroughs and neoconstructive capitalism

If one examines dialectic subcultural theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept the postconceptual paradigm of discourse or conclude that reality serves to oppress the proletariat, given that the premise of neostructuralist nationalism is valid. However, la Fournier[2] states that we have to choose between the postconceptual paradigm of discourse and textual appropriation. The example of neostructuralist nationalism prevalent in Burroughs's The Last Words of Dutch Schultz is also evident in Port of Saints, although in a more self-sufficient sense.

In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the distinction between feminine and masculine. Therefore, Lyotard suggests the use of the postconceptual paradigm of discourse to challenge class divisions. Sartre uses the term 'neostructuralist nationalism' to denote the role of the observer as participant.

But the postconceptual paradigm of discourse holds that reality comes from communication. An abundance of narratives concerning not deconceptualism, but postdeconceptualism exist.

It could be said that Bataille uses the term 'neostructuralist nationalism' to denote the collapse of neomaterialist sexual identity. Baudrillard promotes the use of dialectic subcultural theory to attack class.

Therefore, the characteristic theme of Long's[3] analysis of Lyotardist narrative is the role of the writer as participant. If the postconceptual paradigm of discourse holds, we have to choose between subcultural Marxism and modernist neodialectic theory.

3. Realities of absurdity

If one examines the postconceptual paradigm of discourse, one is faced with a choice: either reject semiotic discourse or conclude that the significance of the writer is deconstruction. But many narratives concerning the postconceptual paradigm of discourse may be discovered. D'Erlette[4] suggests that we have to choose between subcultural theory and dialectic rationalism.

"Sexual identity is intrinsically used in the service of capitalism," says Bataille; however, according to Wilson[5] , it is not so much sexual identity that is intrinsically used in the service of capitalism, but rather the defining characteristic, and eventually the dialectic, of sexual identity. In a sense, Foucault uses the term 'the postconceptual paradigm of discourse' to denote a neoconstructivist whole. The primary theme of the works of Fellini is the role of the artist as participant.

However, Debord suggests the use of dialectic subcultural theory to deconstruct the status quo. Baudrillard's essay on neostructuralist nationalism holds that sexuality is capable of truth.

Therefore, if the postconceptual paradigm of discourse holds, we have to choose between dialectic submodernist theory and cultural narrative. Sartre uses the term 'dialectic subcultural theory' to denote the bridge between class and narrativity.

But the premise of predialectic libertarianism states that society has objective value, given that truth is distinct from art. The characteristic theme of Geoffrey's[6] critique of neostructuralist nationalism is not, in fact, theory, but pretheory.

2. la Fournier, F. W. ed. (1971) The postconceptual paradigm of discourse in the works of Koons. And/Or Press

3. Long, F. H. W. (1990) Narratives of Fatal flaw: The postconceptual paradigm of discourse and neostructuralist nationalism. University of Massachusetts Press

4. d'Erlette, F. G. ed. (1972) Libertarianism, Derridaist reading and the postconceptual paradigm of discourse. O'Reilly & Associates

5. Wilson, D. (1988) Reassessing Realism: The postconceptual paradigm of discourse in the works of Fellini. Cambridge University Press

6. Geoffrey, W. O. ed. (1991) Neostructuralist nationalism and the postconceptual paradigm of discourse. Schlangekraft

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak and modified slightly by Pope Dubious Provenance XI using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars.

This installation of the Generator has delivered 502784 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: "On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks". An on-line copy is available here.

More generated texts are linked to from the Communications From Elsewhere front page.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal's brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.